Not going to Dreamwidth
Dec. 23rd, 2011 07:27 amIf the people I migrated to LJ for mostly leave LJ in the wake of the recent upgrades no one likes, I shall probably not move to Dreamwidth as most of them seem to be planning (or to already have done over the years in response to other last straws). In 2005 when Usenet was gasping, LJ seemed to be the place everyone was going; but then I didn't already have a second social network established, and Dreamwidth just doesn't inspire any emotional attraction. If LJ dies and I feel a need for somewhere I can use more'n 140 characters at once, perhaps I'll start actually using Google+ where I have family. Or I'll see whether scarfman is still available at Tumblr which includes image hosting. Or I may just use, you know, my own existing website.
I won't delete my LJ or anything. I'll probably keep mirroring Twitter, and may continue with rare entries (such as I've been doing lately ...). But I may stop paying for it. I wonder what that'd do to userpic selection in the archives.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-23 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-23 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-25 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-23 05:32 pm (UTC)I did just send a backup of my journal over to Dreamwidth just in case Putin decides to shut things down.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-23 07:08 pm (UTC)I backup each month's entries with the LJ tool for that. It doesn't preserve comments though, as Dreamwidth does (or can), which is attractive. That aspect does tempt me.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-23 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-23 10:30 pm (UTC)Yeah, part of the reason I'm not actively abandoning LJ is that issue.