Lord Darcy
Jul. 9th, 2011 04:07 pmRandall Garrett's Lord Darcy series of stories, about a detective in a world of magic instead of science, endeared itself to me when I first read it a quarter century ago because I figured out who the murderer was halfway through the first story, "The Eyes Have It". It all comes of recognizing a, or the, most significant clue when it comes along.
I also figured out the murderer halfway through the only novel-length story, Too Many Magicians - though that wasn't from any internal clue in the story.
Spoiler in the paragraph below
The murderer was the only character in the novel besides the series leads who was ever the point-of-view character in the prose. I figured it out during the swordfight.
End spoiler.
For someone who loves puns, I have a lot of those that reportedly pervade Garrett's works go right past me. In the case of Too Many Magicians it may just be because I'm not particularly an aficianado of the mystery genre and the sources of the wordplay. It's been about twenty years since I last read it, though, so I may have more of the referents this time.
Though, when I first read the novel, Lord Darcy's cousin the Marquis de London caught my attention. de London is corpulent and indolent, and I thought, "Mycroft Holmes." But Mycroft Holmes does get out a little, and de London never leaves his home and his garden. Then I realized the botany aspect was indicative of Nero Wolfe, a character I know of but only second-hand. "de London is Nero Wolfe," I realized, "and his aide Lord Bontriomphe is Archie Goodwin."
Then I thought, "Good win."
Then I thought, "Bon triomphe."
Then I had to put the book aside for five minutes while I calmed down.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-09 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-10 02:00 am (UTC)Too Many Cooks
Too Many Women
Too Many Clients
I've read the first two; the third is annoyingly long out of print.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-10 04:47 am (UTC)I knew who the murderer was in Too Many Magicians from the first sentence in which the character is mentioned - again, not from an internal clue. It's one of those sentences that's cleverly designed to mean something completely different the second time you read the story, and it happened that I'd recently read an Agatha Christie sentence that was clever in just the same way, so I saw what it was doing.
My big missing-the-referent moment with the Darcy stories was that the first time I read "The Bitter End" I completely failed to recognise the interfering Sergeant-at-Arms Cougair-Chasseur. Well, I was young, and had not yet seen any of the films about Le cougair rose...
no subject
Date: 2011-07-10 01:46 pm (UTC)I don't think I'd seen any of those films yet when I first read Garrett either. Though I owned the music on a 45.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 02:21 pm (UTC)I'm not sure Garrett would ever have included a direct counterpart to Holmes, anyway, because he's out-of-period. It's my impression that he only included direct counterparts of characters who were still actively contemporary (de London and Cougair-Chasseur, as already mentioned, and of course Sir James le Lien...), but for older characters there are only references; "The Napoli Express" has a great big shout-out to Father Brown, for instance, but not an appearance by the man himself.
(Of course Michael Kurland put Irene Eagleson in one of his Lord Darcy novels, but that's a different kettle of fish.)
no subject
Date: 2011-07-10 02:39 pm (UTC)