link seen at [livejournal.com profile] pbristow

Jun. 13th, 2010 04:41 pm
scarfman: (arthur)
[personal profile] scarfman

If you care to rebut those who criticize Merlin as unhistorical for having an African-descended castmember (with more substance than, "Yeah? What year is it set? Which episode's that dialog in? Got a map from that year with Camelot labeled?" or, "Oh, and the dragon is historical?"), bookmark this.

I'm going to have to rethink not having any black people in AKOTAS.

Date: 2010-06-13 10:24 pm (UTC)
sabremeister: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sabremeister
Yeah, that's a good article, makes a lot of good points and so on. But even so, the number of non-whites in Merlin is disproportionate. It's about right for today's population, but not for roughly 1600 years ago (when the Arthurian legends are generally thought to occur) to 800 years ago (the time of the Robin Hood legends, another victim of the Beeb's colour-blind casting.

This film probably has a reasonably accurate depiction of both attitudes to and numbers/occupations of non-whites in medieval Britain, despite being utterly preposterous on the whole. Think about it - why were Gormund the African, Palamedes the Saracen and Thorstein the Black given those names? Because that was their most readily distinguishing feature. They weren't one among many, they were one among a few. Yes, Britain did have a noticeable non-white population in around 400AD, but most of them would have come over with the Roman Legions in 55BC or 43AD, either as soldiers or slaves, and when the Romans left, they would have lost their semi-protected status that close associations with an army brings. In other words, prejudice would have reared its ugly head, and the non-white population would have started to go down (proportionately, if not numerically). Any non-whites remaining would have been socially forced into lower-grade jobs - blacksmiths, servants, soldiers, and so on. The soldiers could have had an opportunity to make a name for themselves in combat, even reaching the heights of ruling their own fiefdom. And unless they stayed on their throne long enough to raise children who grew up as nobles, or if the king they served ennobled them for some act of heroism or chivalry, they would stay in low-grade jobs. They wouldn't become knights or abbesses, they'd become men-at-arms or nuns.

As an aside, I helped teach Angel Coulby to fence as part of her acting course at college.

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 14th, 2026 02:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios